Skip to main content

10 Questions to Ask Yourself About Your Retirement Plan - Part 2

To continue from our previous installment, understanding fiduciary responsibilities is important for the security of a retirement plan and compliance with the law. If you answer “no” to any of the following questions, you may not be complying with federal regulations.

6. Are you prepared to monitor your plan’s service providers?

  • You should create and follow a review process at predetermined intervals to evaluate whether the current service provider is meeting your plan’s needs.
  • This review should take into consideration the provider’s performance, reports, notices, fees, questions and follow-up.
  • The review should include asking the plan’s service providers about policies and practices, ensuring that plan records are properly maintained and following up on participant complaints.
  • The review process should be documented, and when using an internal administrative committee, you should educate committee members on their roles and responsibilities.
7. Have you identified parties-in-interest to the plan and taken steps to monitor transactions        with them?
  • Parties-in-interest to the plan may include:
    • Plan fiduciaries, legal counsel or employees;
    • Individuals who are providing services to the plan;
    • Employers with employees who are covered by the plan;
    • Organizations with members who are covered by the plan (such as a union or employee organization);
  • relatives of any of individuals who are considered parties-in-interest;
    • owners of 50 percent or more of:
      • Combined voting power of a corporation;
      • Capital or profits interest of a partnership;
      • Beneficial interest of a trust or unincorporated enterprise which is an employer with employees who are covered by the plan or an organization with members who are covered by the plan;
      • Employees, officers, directors or 10 percent or more shareholders of individuals who are considered parties-of-interest.
  • Some prohibited transactions include:
      • Sales, exchanges or leases between the plan and a party-in-interest;
      • The lending of money or other credit between the plan and a party-in interest; and
      • The furnishing of goods, services or facilities between the plan and a party-in-interest.
8. Are you aware of the major exemptions under ERISA that permit transactions with parties-in-interest, especially those key for plan operations (such as hiring service providers and making plan loans to participants)?
  • One exemption allows the provision of investment advice to participants who direct the investments in their accounts. This applies to the buying, selling or holding of an investment related to the advice, as well as to the receipt of related fees and other compensation by a fiduciary adviser.
  • Many other exemptions may be applicable, depending on the situation—exemptions that apply to classes of plans and to individual plans can be viewed at www.dol.gov/ebsa in the “Compliance Assistance” section.
9. Have you reviewed your plan document in light of current plan operations and made necessary updates? After amending the plan, have you provided participants with an updated SPD or SMM? 
  • Review your plan document on a regular basis to ensure accuracy.
  • A Summary Plan Description (SPD) explains the plan simply while still providing all of the necessary information on plan features and what to expect—it is provided within 90 days of when coverage begins and is redistributed every five years or within 30 days of a request.
  • A Summary of Material Modification (SMM) informs participants of material changes to the plan or to what is included in the SPD—it is provided within 210 days after the end of the plan year, unless it represents a reduction in covered services or benefits, in which it is provided within 60 days of the change.
10. Do those individuals handling plan funds or other plan property have a fidelity bond?
  • ERISA requires that individuals who handle plan funds have fidelity bonds.
  • The fidelity bonds can be narrow, moderate or broad.
  • The required limit of liability for an individual’s fidelity bond must equal 10 percent of the plan funds handled, with a minimum of $1,000 and a maximum of $500,000 in most cases.
 If you have any questions about this article, or would like to begin talking to a dedicated retirement plan advisor, please get in touch by calling  (800) 388-1963 or via e-mail at hbs@hanys.org.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

SECURE 2.0 Discussion Series: Session Two

The retirement industry has been buzzing since the SECURE 2.0 Act was signed into law last December. This new, comprehensive legislation has sparked a lot of discussion. As with any major reform, it will take time for the industry to fully adapt and understand all its implications. Following our April 11 webinar on the first three months of the industry’s response, our team reconvened to discuss some of what we have heard from our client and vendor partners and to respond to some of the great questions we heard from attendees. Panel participants included the following HBS team members: Noah Buck, Christina Bauer-Dobias, Sean Bayne, Vincent Bocchinfuso and Kathleen Coonan. The Discussion SB – Throughout the webinar, I wanted to stress two things: 1) confusion about where to start and what is expected from plan sponsors is normal; and 2) even more than three months in, this is a developing situation and people should expect changes as time goes on. With those in mind, engagement through
Read more

SECURE 2.0 Discussion Series: Session One

SECURE 2.0 provisions: What we know and what’s still up in the air The SECURE 2.0 Act, signed into law in late December 2022, has factored heavily in retirement industry discourse since the final legislation was published. As with any legislation of this depth and breadth, there’s a lot to digest and the industry takes time to adjust. Our team of experienced advisors recently met to discuss some of the more nuanced provisions of the legislation, such as changes to Roth contributions, and what they could mean for plan sponsors. Panel participants included the following HBS team members: Noah Buck, Christina Bauer-Dobias, Sean Bayne, Vincent Bocchinfuso and Kathleen Coonan. Highlights of our panel’s conversation below should serve to help guide plan sponsor thinking. On Roth employer contributions NB – In addition to deferring pre-tax or Roth, plan sponsors can now allow employer contributions to be classified as Roth, is that right? VB – Correct. This is immediately available to plan s
Read more

What you should know about biosimilars

Rapidly increasing healthcare costs will likely continue to impact employers for the foreseeable future. As a result, many employers are considering strategies to manage these costs, including rising prescription drug costs. The introduction of biosimilar drugs as an alternative to biologics may bring value to healthcare by offering cost savings and increasing employee access to necessary medications. While biosimilars can potentially combat rising prescription drug costs, employers will need to learn more about them before considering how their health plans can accommodate these newer drugs. This article explores biosimilar drugs and ways employers can promote or manage their use. What are biosimilars? The European Medicines Agency defines a biosimilar as “a biological medicine highly similar to another already approved biological medicine.” It is produced from living organisms — humans, animals or microorganisms, meaning they aren’t created from synthesized chemicals. They are also
Read more