Skip to main content

The Perils of a Non-ERISA 403(b) Plan

Non-ERISA 403(b) plans seem to be dropping in popularity among non-profit organizations. Given regulatory guidelines that can be difficult to follow, many plan sponsors are finding it harder to maintain a fully compliant non-ERISA plan. If your non-profit still operates a non-ERISA plan, you may want to give some thought to changing over.

Historically, non-ERISA plans were a popular choice for many non-profit organizations, since they were subject to relatively little regulation. In general, most plan sponsors chose to maintain a plan outside of ERISA to avoid Form 5500 reporting and mandatory audits if the plan had more than 100 participants.

To qualify for non-ERISA status, plan sponsors had to have “limited involvement” in the plan. For instance, non-ERISA requirements precluded employers from being involved in certain basic plan functions, such as approval of plan-to-plan transfers, distribution processing, and addressing applicable joint and survivor annuity requirements.

That began to change in 2009 when the Internal Revenue Service implemented new regulations for 403(b) plans. The strategy was to align 403(b) regulations with those used with 401(k) plans. Unfortunately, the new guidelines had many gray areas that made compliance very challenging. For example, a non-ERISA plan that involved the plan sponsor in the disbursement of employee or hardship loans could be considered an ERISA plan.

Under the current regulatory environment, the distinction between a non-ERISA and an ERISA 403(b) is becoming more obscure. Inadvertent or unintentional involvement by the employer can make the plan subject to ERISA. That means that non-profits run the risk of being penalized by the Department of Labor for breach of ERISA requirements. Just having that risk out there creates an unclear, unsure environment.

Limited plan sponsor involvement can also hinder efforts to encourage greater employee plan participation. Every plan sponsor wants as many employees as possible to participate in their retirement plan. The more plan sponsors are involved, the more they can ensure their plans have the features that employees find attractive and will allow them the best opportunity to enhance their financial future.

Changing from a non-ERISA plan to an ERISA plan is not complicated. Generally, organizations need to:
  • commit to incorporating a 403(b) plan into the organization’s retirement plan objective; 
  • determine how the new plan correlates with the existing retirement program; 
  • develop a strategy to create a single 403(b) plan; 
  • develop a request for proposals to find the most suitable vendor to support your overall objective; and 
  • create a coordinated communication plan to bring the 403(b) into the overall organizational retirement objective. 
Consider creating a “combined” retirement benefit statement incorporating your former retirement plan and the new ERISA 403(b) savings plan. This will offer participants complete information about the prior plan as well as the one taking its place. Additionally, do not overlook significant compliance issues when moving from a non-ERISA plan to an ERISA plan:
  • adopt a new plan document (a plan document is already required under current regulations, even for a non-ERISA plan); 
  • understand and plan for an annual audit if the organization has more than 100 employees—this can be coordinated with audits for the current retirement plan; 
  • file an annual return (Form 5500)—this can also be coordinated with existing filings; and 
  • create a process for fiduciary management and oversight. 
The most important value of transitioning from a non-ERISA to an ERISA 403(b) plan is the ability to fully integrate it into an organizational commitment to successful participant outcomes. An advisor who specializes in this area can be of tremendous help in assisting non-profits in navigating the changeover smoothly and successfully.

All not-for-profit organizations should understand the compelling need to take an active role in helping their employees succeed in their retirement. Taking control and responsibility for their 403(b) plan makes for good business and happier employees.

If you have any questions about this article, or would like to begin talking to a dedicated retirement plan advisor, please get in touch by calling (855) 882-9177 or e-mail us at sbs@hanys.org.

Popular posts from this blog

COVID-19: Retirement and Benefit Plan Resources

As the COVID-19 crisis continues to unfold, we are closely monitoring news and updates from top sources. We’ll be updating this section as new developments unfold. Here are several key articles and links to help plan sponsors and administrators navigate the COVID-19 impact to retirement and benefit plans: Retirement Plans 4 Key CARES Act Provisions for Retirement Plan Sponsors Markets React to Coronavirus   Important Considerations for Retirement Plan Sponsors during the Coronavirus Pandemic In Fed We Trust Participant Education Services: Timely Help from a Safe Distance CRDs 100% Taxable for New York State and Local Income Tax Purposes in 2020 IRS Permits Remote Notarization of Participant Elections   Employee Benefits CARES Act Expands Health Coverage Rules Understanding the Historic $2 Trillion Stimulus Package Employee Compensation and Benefits During Closures and Furloughs DOL Clarifies Exemptions to Coronavirus Paid Leave Laws Small Business Exemption to

SECURE 2.0 Discussion Series: Session One

SECURE 2.0 provisions: What we know and what’s still up in the air The SECURE 2.0 Act, signed into law in late December 2022, has factored heavily in retirement industry discourse since the final legislation was published. As with any legislation of this depth and breadth, there’s a lot to digest and the industry takes time to adjust. Our team of experienced advisors recently met to discuss some of the more nuanced provisions of the legislation, such as changes to Roth contributions, and what they could mean for plan sponsors. Panel participants included the following HBS team members: Noah Buck, Christina Bauer-Dobias, Sean Bayne, Vincent Bocchinfuso and Kathleen Coonan. Highlights of our panel’s conversation below should serve to help guide plan sponsor thinking. On Roth employer contributions NB – In addition to deferring pre-tax or Roth, plan sponsors can now allow employer contributions to be classified as Roth, is that right? VB – Correct. This is immediately available to plan s

SECURE 2.0 Discussion Series: Session Two

The retirement industry has been buzzing since the SECURE 2.0 Act was signed into law last December. This new, comprehensive legislation has sparked a lot of discussion. As with any major reform, it will take time for the industry to fully adapt and understand all its implications. Following our April 11 webinar on the first three months of the industry’s response, our team reconvened to discuss some of what we have heard from our client and vendor partners and to respond to some of the great questions we heard from attendees. Panel participants included the following HBS team members: Noah Buck, Christina Bauer-Dobias, Sean Bayne, Vincent Bocchinfuso and Kathleen Coonan. The Discussion SB – Throughout the webinar, I wanted to stress two things: 1) confusion about where to start and what is expected from plan sponsors is normal; and 2) even more than three months in, this is a developing situation and people should expect changes as time goes on. With those in mind, engagement through