Skip to main content

Automatic Features in Defined Contribution Plans

According to the 2014 Retirement Plan Survey conducted by HANYS Benefit Services, approximately one-half of the responding retirement plan sponsors offer automatic enrollment. Offered in conjunction with automatic escalation, such features can positively impact participant behavior and improve retirement readiness. This article examines some best practices to be considered when implementing automatic features in defined contribution plans that can produce greater results per dollar of employer cost.


The utilization of automatic features in defined contribution plans has increased significantly since they were first introduced as part of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA). More plans are adopting these provisions, resulting in higher participation rates among employees. Although this is a positive trend, certain design features actually thwart the success that could otherwise be achieved. Specifically:
  • relatively low default deferral rates result in lower savings;
  • automatic enrollment is often applied to newly eligible employees only, disregarding existing employees who are not participating; and
  • auto-escalate provisions, if used, are often applied on an opt-in basis rather than an opt-out basis, and at rates too low to achieve targeted savings levels.

Default Deferral Rates

A recent study by Aon Consulting found that participants should save 15% of their pay, including employer contributions, over their working career to provide adequate retirement income. To the extent employees wait to enroll in the plan or enroll at lower contribution levels, the required contribution amount increases.

Multiple studies consistently show that the majority of plans using automatic enrollment use a default rate of 3% savings. This rate mirrors the safe-harbor guidelines, but is required to be used only if adopting a safe-harbor plan, which most plans are not. The 3% rate also is generally believed to be the rate likely to reduce the level at which participants opt out of the program, although there is no empirical evidence suggesting this is the case. Several studies suggest default contribution rates could be increased significantly without a meaningful increase in opt-outs.

To improve the overall savings rates of participants, plan sponsors should auto-enroll all eligible employees at a higher initial default rate. If practical, the initial default contribution rate should be tied to the plan’s maximum matching contribution percentage.

Automatic Enrollment

While automatic enrollment has increased in popularity, the majority of plans only use it to enroll newly eligible employees, perhaps missing other opportunities. At a minimum, plan sponsors should apply auto-enroll to all employees at the time of adoption of the auto-enroll feature. To enhance the program further, a periodic reenrollment of all non-participating employees should be conducted. This can often coincide with the open enrollment period for other employee benefits.

Automatic Contribution Escalation

Automatic contribution escalation, used in conjunction with auto-enrollment, offers a powerful opportunity to improve participant outcomes. To maximize its impact, auto-escalate should be offered on an opt-out basis rather than an opt-in basis. A recent study has shown that of those plans offering auto-increase on an opt-out basis, nearly 65% of participants remained in the program. Where auto-increase was made available on an opt-in basis, only 8% of participants chose to opt in.

Auto-escalate can be enhanced even further by increasing the contribution rate by more than 1% per year. Assuming an initial deferral rate of 3% with 1% annual increases, it will take more than seven years to achieve a double-digit savings rate. An initial rate of 6% combined with 2% annual increases will achieve this level in three years.

Improved Participant Outcomes

By combining auto-enrollment with auto-escalate and increasing the initial default deferral rate, participants can significantly increase their savings over time. Just as participant inertia keeps employees from enrolling in the plan, so, too, can it put them on the path to a more secure retirement when effective auto-features are implemented.
The chart shows projected participant account balances for four different scenarios[1]. Example 1 assumes a default rate of 3% with no auto-escalate provision; Example 2 implements auto-escalate at 1% while Example 3 implements auto-escalate at 2%. Finally, Example 4 sets the default rate at 6% combined with an auto-escalate rate of 2%.


Employers are faced with a number of challenges in designing and offering an effective and meaningful retirement program, particularly in light of budget limitations. By designing a program that uses comprehensive automatic features, participant outcomes can be significantly improved within fiscal constraints.

This article addresses some steps plan sponsors can take to improve participation rates and overall savings rates within defined contribution retirement plans. To read about other plan design changes that can improve participant readiness, read Improving Participant Outcomes: An Action Plan for Plan Sponsors.

If you have any questions about this article, or would like to begin talking to a dedicated retirement plan advisor, please get in touch by calling (800) 388-1963 or e-mail us at

* * *
[1] All examples assume an initial salary of $45,000 with 3% annual increases. Employee contributions are capped at 15% with an employer match of 50% up to 6% of salary. Account balances are projected over 30 years at an assumed rate of 8%.

Popular posts from this blog

COVID-19: Retirement and Benefit Plan Resources

As the COVID-19 crisis continues to unfold, we are closely monitoring news and updates from top sources. We’ll be updating this section as new developments unfold. Here are several key articles and links to help plan sponsors and administrators navigate the COVID-19 impact to retirement and benefit plans: Retirement Plans 4 Key CARES Act Provisions for Retirement Plan Sponsors Markets React to Coronavirus   Important Considerations for Retirement Plan Sponsors during the Coronavirus Pandemic In Fed We Trust Participant Education Services: Timely Help from a Safe Distance CRDs 100% Taxable for New York State and Local Income Tax Purposes in 2020 IRS Permits Remote Notarization of Participant Elections   Employee Benefits CARES Act Expands Health Coverage Rules Understanding the Historic $2 Trillion Stimulus Package Employee Compensation and Benefits During Closures and Furloughs DOL Clarifies Exemptions to Coronavirus Paid Leave Laws Small Business Exemption to

Coronavirus-related distributions 100% taxable for New York state and local income tax purposes in 2020

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law on March 27. Under the Act, participants affected by the coronavirus may be able to take distributions in 2020 of up to $100,000 from an employer-sponsored retirement plan or an IRA. Although allowing these distributions from a qualified retirement plan is optional, we have seen that a number of employers have chosen to amend their plans to permit such distributions. The Act provides that coronavirus-related distributions will not be subject to the mandatory 20% withholding nor the 10% early withdrawal penalty (for those younger than 59½) that would otherwise apply.

ESG retirement investment gets boost from DOL: What plan sponsors should consider

Plan sponsors considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in their investments received promising news with the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) latest update in November. Although ESG investing has received increased attention over the past few years, DOL has not been transparent in defining how qualified retirement programs should incorporate ESG-specific metrics into their selection process. Until recently, the prevailing tone of DOL’s messaging has been that ESG should be secondary to financial factors. The Biden administration had hinted at loosening restrictions on ESG investing that were implemented during the final days of the Trump administration and forgone enforcement of those restrictions in the interim. This latest development is a realization of those earlier signals. With the announcement of DOL’s new rule, plan sponsors can, but are not required to, include ESG factors in their investment searches. Notably, plan sponsors can include ESG factors in th