Skip to main content

Plan Sponsors Get Welcome Relief for Automatic Enrollment Features

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently announced modified correction methods for errors relating to automatic contribution features, including automatic enrollment, automatic escalation, and employee elective deferrals in both 401(k) and 403(b) plans.

The correction methods in the new Revenue Procedure 2015-28 are in addition to those previously identified in Revenue Procedure 2013-12. These new correction methods will encourage employers to more readily include automatic enrollment features in their defined contribution plans.

BACKGROUND: ELECTIVE DEFERRAL FAILURES
Defined contribution plans with automatic enrollment or automatic escalation must take deductions from employees as soon as possible after enrollment. An “elective deferral failure” occurs if an employer fails to implement deductions properly or in a timely manner because:
  • the eligible employee was not automatically enrolled;
  • the employee’s deferral election was not properly implemented;
  • the deferral percentage was not automatically increased; or 
  • the employee was mistakenly excluded from the plan.
Under current safe harbor rules, these deferral failures can be costly for an employer. If employee deductions were missed, the employer would need to make a qualified non-elective contribution (QNEC) to the employee’s account. This would be equal to 50% of the missed deduction amount, plus any related employer match, plus investment earnings.

ENCOURAGING NEWS FROM IRS
Recognizing that the potential cost of QNEC discourages employers from adopting automatic enrollment and/or automatic escalation features, IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2015-28 to modify the safe harbor correction methods for deferral failures within a 401(k) or 403(b) plan. This new corrective action not only encourages employers to adopt and/or to retain automatic enrollment features, but also encourages the early correction of missed deferrals, should they occur.

New Correction Methods for Elective Deferral Failures: Automatic Enrollment Plans
QNEC is waived for auto-enrollment or auto-escalation deferral failures as long as the employer follows these steps:
  1. The missed deferral must be corrected by the earlier of: 
    • 9½ months after the end of the plan year in which the failure occurred; or 
    • if the employee notified the employer of the error, the first pay period in the second month following the employer being notified. 
  2. A notice of the failure is given to the employee within 45 days of the corrected deferrals. 
  3. Any related employer match, plus investment earnings, is given to the employee. 

New Correction Methods for Elective Deferral Failures: Other than Automatic Enrollment Plans
QNEC is waived for employee elective deferral failures identified within three months, as long as the employer follows these steps:
  1. The missed deferral must be corrected by the earlier of: 
    • the first pay period following the missed deferrals; or 
    • if the employee notified the employer of the error, the first pay period in the second month following the employer being notified. 
  2. A notice of the failure is given to the employee within 45 days of the corrected deferrals. 
  3. Any related employer match, plus investment earnings, is given to the employee. 
Modified Correction Method
If the deferrals cannot be corrected in the timeframes outlined above, a modified correction method may be used. Under this scenario, a QNEC equal to 25% of the missed deferrals (plus earnings) can be made if corrections are made by the earlier of:
  • the first pay period following the end of the second year following the plan year of the missed deferrals; or 
  • if the employee notified the employer of the error, the first pay period in the second month following the employer being notified.
A notice of the failure must also be given to the employee within 45 days of the corrected deferrals.

If the modified correction method cannot be used (i.e., the deferrals were not corrected within the timeframes outlined) then the correction methods outlined in Revenue Procedure 2013-12 must be used (a QNEC of 50% of the missed deferrals, any employer matching contributions, plus earnings).

CONCLUSION

These new and modified rules for missed deferrals provide welcome relief for sponsors of 401(k) and 403(b) plans. Plan sponsors who may have been discouraged from implementing automatic enrollment features in their plans may now feel more comfortable adopting these methods as a way to help employees save for their retirement.

To learn more about how plan sponsors can improve participation rates and overall savings rates within their retirement plans, read Automatic Features in Defined Contribution Plans. If you have questions about this article, or would like to speak with a dedicated retirement plan advisor, please call (800) 388-1963 or email us at hbs@hanys.org.

Popular posts from this blog

SECURE 2.0 Discussion Series: Session Two

The retirement industry has been buzzing since the SECURE 2.0 Act was signed into law last December. This new, comprehensive legislation has sparked a lot of discussion. As with any major reform, it will take time for the industry to fully adapt and understand all its implications. Following our April 11 webinar on the first three months of the industry’s response, our team reconvened to discuss some of what we have heard from our client and vendor partners and to respond to some of the great questions we heard from attendees. Panel participants included the following HBS team members: Noah Buck, Christina Bauer-Dobias, Sean Bayne, Vincent Bocchinfuso and Kathleen Coonan. The Discussion SB – Throughout the webinar, I wanted to stress two things: 1) confusion about where to start and what is expected from plan sponsors is normal; and 2) even more than three months in, this is a developing situation and people should expect changes as time goes on. With those in mind, engagement through

SECURE 2.0 Discussion Series: Session One

SECURE 2.0 provisions: What we know and what’s still up in the air The SECURE 2.0 Act, signed into law in late December 2022, has factored heavily in retirement industry discourse since the final legislation was published. As with any legislation of this depth and breadth, there’s a lot to digest and the industry takes time to adjust. Our team of experienced advisors recently met to discuss some of the more nuanced provisions of the legislation, such as changes to Roth contributions, and what they could mean for plan sponsors. Panel participants included the following HBS team members: Noah Buck, Christina Bauer-Dobias, Sean Bayne, Vincent Bocchinfuso and Kathleen Coonan. Highlights of our panel’s conversation below should serve to help guide plan sponsor thinking. On Roth employer contributions NB – In addition to deferring pre-tax or Roth, plan sponsors can now allow employer contributions to be classified as Roth, is that right? VB – Correct. This is immediately available to plan s

What you should know about biosimilars

Rapidly increasing healthcare costs will likely continue to impact employers for the foreseeable future. As a result, many employers are considering strategies to manage these costs, including rising prescription drug costs. The introduction of biosimilar drugs as an alternative to biologics may bring value to healthcare by offering cost savings and increasing employee access to necessary medications. While biosimilars can potentially combat rising prescription drug costs, employers will need to learn more about them before considering how their health plans can accommodate these newer drugs. This article explores biosimilar drugs and ways employers can promote or manage their use. What are biosimilars? The European Medicines Agency defines a biosimilar as “a biological medicine highly similar to another already approved biological medicine.” It is produced from living organisms — humans, animals or microorganisms, meaning they aren’t created from synthesized chemicals. They are also